Leprechaun
|
IMDB rating: 4.20 Plot: The movie that started it all. Warwick Davis from Willow plays a mean Leprechaun that doesn’t like to play by the rules, and will kill anyone who goes near his gold. A somewhat delusional man named Dan O’Grady brings home the gold from Ireland after he caught the leprechaun, only Leprechaun had followed him and wreaks havoc until Dan locks him in a crate and attempts to burn him, but has a stroke. 10 years later, two people buy the O’Grady’s old house, (they are J.D. and his spoiled daughter Tory), not knowing what is locked in a crate in the basement. Also there are three painters: Nathan, his brother Alex, and Alex’s dim friend Ozzie. That afternoon Ozzie and Alex find the Leprechaun’s gold, and Ozzie accidentally releases Leprechaun from his crate and he goes on a killing spree and terrorizes the four friends, trying to get his missing gold coin back. Finally they learn the only way to destroy it is to go find Dan O’Grady, thinking he may know a way. They find him at a rest home, he tells them a four leaf clover is the only way. So now Tory and her friends must find a four leaf clover in a big clover patch before Leprechaun finds them! |
Actors: Davis Warwick,Olandt Ken,Holton Mark,Gorman Robert Hy,Duffin Shay,Sanderford John,Voldstad John,Newman William,Permenter David,Turner Raymond C.,Garrick Tim,Sachs Brandon,Comedy,Fantasy,Horror,
Militant agnostics, what else are you agnostic on that I don't believe in? Santa? Tooth Fairy? Leprechauns?
By "militant agnostics", I mean the ones that say everyone else is basically stupid for not being agnostic like them.
I got a nastygram in my e-mail from one.
Hello, Old Man…long time no see, hm?
Has there been a militant agnostic uprising here since I’ve been gone? They are generally pretty quiet, unless you tell them that they’re ‘fence-sitters’ 
Isobel | Feb 03, 2010
hmmmm, never met or heard of agnostics like that, that would be acting like a christian.
why so serious? | Feb 03, 2010
The people you’re referring to aren’t genuinely agnostic – they probably don’t understand what it really means, and your question would just confuse them further.
You could, if were so inclined, make a case for everyone who believed it possible to know something absolutely to have failed to understand the nature of knowledge. However, given that "agnostic" refers specifically to metaphysical claims, you’d have ventured beyond the bounds of discussing agnosticism and just be trying to ram some bizarre extreme epistemology down people’s necks.
You could do it, but you’d look like an idiot though.
aaronmsl | Feb 03, 2010
I don’t know?
Auntie Christ
Possibly Related Posts:
